REAP… A REVIEW OF U.S. UNION MEMBERSHIP

March 5, 2007

E-MAIL: INFO@REAPINC.ORG           WEBSITE: WWW.REAPINC.ORG

 

 

  According to a U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics report on union membership dated January 5, 2007, U.S. union membership stood as follows:

 

  A) In 2006, 12.0 percent of wage and salaried workers were union members down from 12.3 percent.

 

  B) Of the 123.5 million workers over 16 years of age, 12.0 percent or 15.4 million workers were union members.

 

  C) Union membership has declined since 1953, when the percent of American   workers who belonged to unions reached 32.5 percent.

 

  

 

 UNION MEMBERSHIP IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

 

Sector

Number of Workers

Percent in Unions

Federal Government

3.3 million

33.7%

State Government

5.6 million

33.6%

Local Government

10.7 million

45.7%

 

 

 UNION MEMBERSHIP IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR

 

Sector

Number of Workers

Percent Union

Private

103.5 million

7.4%

 

 

HIGHLY ORGANIZED INDUSTRY SECTORS IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR

 

Industry

Number of Workers

Percent Union

Transportation & Utilities

4.8 million

24.3%

Transportation & Warehousing

4.2 million

23.4%

Utilities

850,000

29.1%

Telecommunications

1.3 million

22.1%

Construction

7.5 million

13.6%

Manufacturing

15.7 million

12.5%

Information

3 million

13.0%

Educational Services

3.2 million

15.9%

Mining

496,000

8.8%

 

E) About 1.5 million workers in 2006 were covered by a union contract but were not members of a union.

 

F) In 2006, 29 states and the District of Columbia had union membership below the U.S. average of 12.0 percent while 20 states had higher rates and one had the same..

 

G) Almost half of the 15.4 million union workers (7.5 million) lived in six states: California , New York , Illinois , Michigan , Ohio and New Jersey.

 

H) The largest number of union members lived in: California (2.3 million), New York (2.0 million) and Illinois (0.90 million).

 

J) North Carolina and South Carolina continue to show the lowest union membership rate of 3.3 each.

 

 

 CHARACTERISTICS OF UNION MEMBERS

 

Characteristic

Percent Union Members

Men

13.0%

Women

10.9%

Blacks

14.5%

Whites

11.7%

Asians

10.4%

Hispanics

 9.8%

Full-Time Workers

13.1%

Part-Time Workers

6.3%

 

 MEDIAN WEEKLY EARNINGS FULL-TIME WAGE AND SALARY WORKERS

 

All workers over 16 yrs. old

$833 Union

$642 Non-Union

Men

$887 Union

$717 Non-Union

Women

$758 Union

$579 Non Union

White

$859 Union

$659 Non-Union

Black

$707 Union

$520 Non-Union

Hispanic/Latino

$686 Union

$469 Non-Union

Asian

$834 Union

$774 Non-Union

 

 PERCENT OF UNION MEMBERS BY STATE 2005

 

State

Percent Union Members

Alabama

10.0%

Alaska

23.8%

Arizona

9.7%

Arkansas

6.0%

California

16.9%

Colorado

8.6%

Connecticut

16.5%

Deleware

11.4%

District of Columbia

12.2%

Florida

6.5%

Georgia

5.8%

Hawaii

25.9%

Idaho

7.2%

Illinois

17.2%

Indiana

13.0%

Iowa

14.0%

Kansas

9.3%

Kentucky

11.2%

Louisiana

7.2%

Maine

13.5%

Maryland

14.8%

Massachusetts

15.3%

Michigan

20.4%

Minnesota

16.8%

Mississippi

7.3%

Missouri

11.9%

Montana

13.1%

Nebraska

9.5%

Nevada

17.0%

New Hampshire

11.3%

New Jersey

21.6%

New Mexico

11.5%

New York

25.4%

North Carolina

4.1%

North Dakota

8.0%

Ohio

15.5%

Oklahoma

7.7%

Oregon

14.7%

Pennsylvania

14.7%

Rhode Island

16.0%

South Carolina

4.2%

South Dakota

7.2%

Tennessee

6.8%

Texas

5.9%

Utah

6.1%

Vermont

12.9%

Virginia

5.2%

Washington

21.0%

West Virginia

15.5%

Wisconsin

16.1%

Wyoming

10.0%

 

RESISTENCE TO ORGANIZED LABOR

 

  The creation of the labor movement in the United States was one of the most violent in the world. American capitalists in the 19 th Century used their vast wealth and resources to destroy unionization wherever it cropped up. Employer litigation against unions, mass firings, beatings, and even killings were common place in America . Employers and their reactionary political friends at all levels of government have and continue to try and destroy organized labor.

 

  The freedom of workers to join together in unions and bargain collectively is a fundamental human right that U.S. labor law guarantees in principle. A law that has been on the books since 1935, however, when American workers seek to exercise this right today, they nearly always meet threats, coercion and outright warfare from the employers. These and other tactics are designed to suppress workers' freedoms to organize a union. They do so with devastating effectiveness.

 

 

Employer Interference by the Numbers

 

1) Employers that illegally fire at least one worker for union activity during an organizing drive: 25%.

 

2) Employers that hire union–busting consultants to help destroy organizing drives: 75%

 

3) Employers that force employees to attend one on one anti-union meetings: 78%

 

4) Employers that force employees to attend mandatory anti-union presentations: 92%

 

5) Employers that threaten to call the Immigration Service during an organizing drive that includes undocumented employees: 52%

 

6) Companies that threaten to close the facility if the union wins the election: 51%

 

7) Companies that actually close their facility after the union wins the election: 1%

 

8) Workers in 1998 who won cases proving they had been illegally discriminated against for union activity: 24,000

 

9) Non-union workers who say they want to join a union: 42 million.

 

10) Share of U.S. workers who belong to unions: 12.9 percent.

 

11) Share of U.S. workers who would be in unions if workers could choose freely: 44%

 

 

Sources: Human Rights Watch , U.S. Trade Deficit Review, Impact of Capital Mobility on Workers, Wages and Union Organizing Kate Bronfenbrenner, AFL-CIO

 

 

 THE GALLUP ORGANIZTION POLL SHOWS

 

  Despite labor's small membership base today and Corporate America's unrelenting attack on unions, most Americans approve of labor unions and believe that unions are generally helpful to workers who are union members, helpful to companies where workers are organized, and helpful to the economy.

 

  Public reaction to labor unions is one of the longest running trends maintained by the Gallup Poll. The question of “Do you approve or disapprove of labor unions?” was first asked in 1936, one year after Congress passed the Wagner Act establishing the right of private sector employees to join unions.

 

DO YOU APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE OF UNIONS

 

Date

Approve

Disapprove

No Opinion

2003

65%

29%

6%

2002

58%

33%

9%

2001

60%

32%

8%

1999

65%

28%

7%

1997

60%

31%

9%

1991

60%

30%

10%

1986

59%

30%

11%

1985

58%

27%

15%

1981

55%

35%

11%

1979

55%

33%

12%

1978

59%

31%

10%

1972

60%

25%

15%

1967

66%

23%

11%

1965

71%

19%

11%

1963

68%

22%

10%

1962

64%

24%

11%

1961

69%

20%

11%

1959

73%

14%

12%

1958

64%

21%

15%

1953

75%

18%

7%

1948

64%

21%

15%

1947

64%

25%

11%

1941

61%

30%

9%

1936

72%

20%

8%

 

 

   When Americans were asked if unions do more good than harm, 58 percent responded more good while 39 percent responded more harm. Gallup Poll August 2003.

 

  According to a Gallup Poll when asked. “overall do you think labor unions mostly help or mostly hurt,” Americans responded:

 

August 2003

76% Mostly Help

20% Mostly Hurt

4% No Opinion

August 2001

74% Mostly Help

20% Mostly Hurt

6% No Opinion

March 1999

72% Mostly Help

24 Mostly Hurt

4% No Opinion

 

 

 

Unions a Powerful Force Lifting All Workers, Study Finds ( October 7, 2003 )

By Cynthia Green

Unions' positive impact on workers' wages, job security and benefits is well documented, but what isn't as widely acknowledged is how these higher standards raise the compensation and improve the work lives of even non-unionized workers.

A recent report by the Economic Policy Institute, "How Unions Help All Workers," outlines a virtuous circle of organized labor's beneficial effect on the general workforce, from pay and total compensation to benefits and workplace protections.

"Unions have set norms and established practices that become more generalized throughout the economy, thereby improving pay and working conditions for the entire workforce, particularly for the vast majority of workers who are not college educated,” authors Lawrence Mishel and Matthew Walters write.

A dynamic known as the "union threat effect" tends to improve compensation and labor practices for nonunion workers in industries, occupations and markets where unions have a strong presence, according to the report. Put simply, nonunion employers who fear unionization will often pay their employees more to discourage the move to collective bargaining.

Mishel, EPI's president, and Walters cite a recent study showing a positive threat effect for the 1970s, ‘80s and mid-‘90s. Though tricky to quantify, the average nonunion worker in an industry with 25% union density appears to enjoy 5.0% to 7.5% higher wages because of union presence. As union density erodes, however, the positive threat effect on wages also slows.

Because the nonunion sector is large, according to the EPI report, "the impact of unions on total nonunion wages is almost as large as the impact on total union wages."

Still, unions raise the pay of their members by about 20% and increase total compensation, which includes benefits, by roughly 28%, the report said. The average union wage premium – the amount that union wages exceed nonunion pay – is about 15%, the authors write.

And unions contribute to reducing wage inequalities because they improve pay for lower-income workers more than higher earners, for blue-collar employees more than white-collar, and for workers without a college degree.

Disparities are even greater in the arena of benefits, the report notes.

"Unionized workers are more likely than their nonunionized counterparts to receive paid leave, are approximately 18% to 28% more likely to have employer-provided health insurance, and are 23% to 54% more likely to be in employer-provided pension plans," the authors write.

Union workers get about 26% more vacation time and 14% more total paid time off, which includes holidays.

Health benefits tend to be better for union workers, who typically pay 18% less in health care deductibles than their nonunion counterparts, while retired union workers are 24% more likely to be covered by employer-paid health insurance, the report finds.

Union-protected workers also are more likely to get a guaranteed pension benefit, and their employers contribute about 28% more toward pensions than nonunion employers do, Mishel and Walters say.

Notably, items that were once considered "fringe" benefits, like pensions and health insurance, first appeared in unionized settings and then spread to nonunion shops, the report says. Nonunion workplaces also copied union grievance procedures, and unions have also set standards for pay.

"Until the mid-1980s," the report notes, "many sectors of the economy followed the ‘pattern' set in collective bargaining agreements," though the subsequent weakening of unions has lessened this broad impact.

Nonetheless, unions have brought other innovations to the workplace, from training and worker participation to child care, flex-time and sick leave benefits, Mishel and Walters write.

More broadly, unions have been central to securing basic labor legislation that affects all workers – and in subsequently enforcing those regulations, covering areas like minimum wage and overtime pay, unemployment insurance and workers' compensation, and even civil rights.

"Over the years, these rules have become mainstays of the American workplace experience, constituting expressions of cherished public values," the authors write. "The labor protections enjoyed by the entire U.S. workforce can be attributed in large part to unions," they say.

Further, "unions make a substantial and measurable difference in the implementation of labor laws," Mishel and Walters say. Crucially, unions inform their members about their rights and the procedures for enforcing labor protections, and they facilitate action in many ways, including by discouraging employer retaliation and by negotiating disputes on behalf of their members, the authors note. So it is not surprising that a unionized worker is far more likely to file a claim or report an abuse in the arenas of unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, occupational health and safety, family and medical leave, pensions and overtime.

"Unions not only improve workers' benefits, they also contribute to due process and provide a democratic voice for workers at the workplace and in the larger society," Mishel and Walters write.

Cynthia Green is a freelance writer.

REAP

E-MAIL: INFO@REAPINC.ORG

WEBSITE: REAPINC.ORG

Home | All About REAP REAP News & Views |
Helpful Statistics  |  Announcements | Related Publications & Websites |
All About UFCW Briefing Papers Rights of Union Members |
U.S. Workforce | Profile of Union Movement/AFL-CIO |  Profile of Meat Packing Industry |
Profile of Retail Grocery Store & Industry | Labor History & Legislation |
Privacy Statement

 

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LARGEST 11 UNIONS IN THE AFL-CIO

 Union

Membership

SEIU

1,500,000

Teamsters

1,271,039

AFSCME

1,236,042

UFCW 1/

   989,340

UAW

   766,032

Teachers

   694,402

IBEW

   653,946

CWA

   503,558

 IAM

   431,058

Laborers

   297,618

Postal Workers

  279,313 

   

 TOTAL UNION COMPENSATION COST

TOTAL NON-UNION COMPENSATION COST 

 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST FOR UNION BENEFITS

 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST FOR NON-UNION BENEFITS

 $27.80

 $19.98

 $9.45

 $5.17
       
       

 TOTAL UNION COMPENSATION COST

TOTAL NON-UNION COMPENSATION COST 

 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST FOR UNION BENEFITS

 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST FOR NON-UNION BENEFITS

 $27.80

 $19.98

 $9.45

 $5.17
       
       

 

 TOTAL UNION COMPENSATION COST

TOTAL NON-UNION COMPENSATION COST 

 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST FOR UNION BENEFITS

 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST FOR NON-UNION BENEFITS

 $27.80

 $19.98

 $9.45

 $5.17